Saturday, February 4, 2017

A Much Belated Update.

Many apologies for not posting updates in the past month. It was a whirlwind, both in the community and in personal lives, and continues to be one.

On Tuesday, January 10, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to DENY approval of LG Realty's Preliminary Land Development Plan. This approval was required for them to move forward with their proposal to reconfigure the public park and their site to accommodate a new 50,000 s.f. Whole Foods, 200 or so units of market rate housing, and about 600 parking spaces in a multi-story parking garage on the edge of the park.

The official transcript has not yet been made public, but among the concerns cited by Commissioners in their deliberations were:
  • Concerns for traffic and pedestrian access to the site in relation to the surrounding neighborhood
  • Lack of community engagement in the development and vetting of the PLDP
  • That the proposal does not "create a favorable environmental, social and economic impact on the City" [important! This is a direct quote from the Zoning Code for one of the criteria that Commission should use to review the proposal] 
  • That the proposal does not actually meet the criteria established by City Council in the zone change from April 2016, particularly in relation to the reconfiguration of the park. 
Here are some of the articles covering the hearing:

Tim Schooley in the Pittsburgh Business Times
Mark Belko in the Post-Gazette.
Bob Bauder in the Trib.
A piece on WPXI.

If you want to actually watch the discussion among the Commission, Jacquea Mae took live video of the hearing that you can view on Facebook. 

But of course...

LG Realty filed an appeal of the decision not a week later, before the official transcript had even been released. In their appeal, they claim that the decision was "unabashedly political". The process for the appeal is that it will go to conference before a judge in late February, with the parties then providing briefs to the judge within a time frame to be determined at the conference. There is no testimony taken. It could be three to six months before a final decision is rendered by the judge. And then there would be an opportunity for either party to appeal THAT decision, which could add another 1-2 years to the process.

However, in the meantime...


view from Negley

view from Negley

LG Realty decided to cut down all the trees on their property (NOT the park - they don't have legal access to it yet). 


fence work in starting...
not like we will have any more snow due to climate change, but the Enright Park sledding hill was well used

LG Realty is in the process of  putting up a fence to keep the community off of the small hill that sits adjacent to the park (and is their property) and has been used for decades as a sledding hill for the kids in the neighborhood. 

There was a brief interlude when we were all being encouraged to come together and work through the differences on the development. [Qualifier to this piece: the main contention of the community is that they are attempting to take public land, in the form of the park, to enhance their development, and yet have not met the standards that were established. As in much of the reporting on Penn Plaza and Enright Park, is sounds in this article as if the developer is only working on their own property and not receiving massive benefit from a reconfiguration of a public park. Our position remains that, if one is taking advantage of public assets, the public has the right and the responsibility to weigh in on the development above and beyond what might be required of a development solely on private property.]

notices appeared on the site Friday morning.
 
AND OF COURSE... LG Realty has filed ANOTHER claim and posted THESE notices on the fence surrounding the site. 

Essentially, they are claiming that because a WRITTEN decision of the Planning Commission has not been issued within the time frame cited, their project is "deemed approved" and they plan to move "full steam ahead". We should note that the actual Planning Commission vote DID occur within the time frame cited (although it's questionable as to whether or not that actually applies in this case), and that there is not a clear requirement that there be written decisions regardless. In the past, Planning Commission decisions were simply recorded into the transcript of the proceedings.

Interestingly, the same day that the notices appeared, the Post-Gazette published an article that extensively quotes their lawyer, Jonathan Kamin. 

Before the end of the day, the Mayor's Office had issued a strongly worded statement on the matter, stating “...planning commission explicitly denied Pennley Park’s application and development plan within the legal time period of the official submission. We will fight these legal tricks before the Common Pleas court.”

Thank you Mayor Peduto for assuring East Liberty, and other neighborhoods that are facing developer pressures, that you stand with Planning Commission and support their decisions!

 

What's Next, you may ask?

We will keep you posted about the developments. In the meantime:
  • Check out the gorgeous image and words that artist Vanessa German created at Penn Plaza a few weeks ago
  • The images and discussion from the inspiring Our Feminism Must Be Intersectional march that was held on January 21, which started at Penn Plaza. 
  • And PLEASE take a moment to read the Love Notes to East Liberty that were posted on the Penn Plaza fence as part of that event. Thank you Rachel Nunes for taking such care to document them. They were, not surprisingly, removed by building management a few days later.
Things may be moving too fast to get onto the website for a little bit, but please follow along on Facebook and on Twitter!

(And we promise to post with information not related to the park soon! Good things coming to the Enright Community Garden this year. Stay tuned in order to get involved!)

Monday, January 2, 2017

New Year's Resolutions: If It's Not for All, It's Not for Us!


Join Us in Making it Known – 

We are a #NeighborhoodforAll #EastLibertyforAll 

Thank you to everyone who came out to the community meeting on Monday, December 12 and the Planning Commission on Tuesday, December 13. We know it has been whiplash for many people who are just now becoming aware of the full scope of the developer’s proposals for East Liberty.

What we all heard loud and clear was that East Liberty needs affordable housing ON THIS SITE, and that East Liberty needs public open spaces that serve ALL community members. 

We can and we will have both of these. Affordable housing, public parks, and new development are not mutually exclusive.

Our message to the City, to the Planning Commission, and to the developers is this:
  1. Commit to affordable housing on Phase Two of the Pennley Place South development, at a minimum level of 20% of units for long-term affordability.*
  2. Deliver on the Council-conditioned Enright Park, which will “be of equivalent size and function of the existing park” and for which “there will be sufficient building setback along the eastern border of the park to protect and preserve the existing trees”.

Why Here?

Concentrations of wealth can be just as detrimental to the community fabric as concentrations of poverty. Creating residential enclaves that isolate residents from their neighbors through either physical design or social structure reduces interaction and our ability to empathize with those who are different than us. It is our intention to break down the barriers that were created by the 1960s “renewal”, not to create new ones in the gloss of 2016 design trends.

The value of the Penn Plaza and Enright Park sites to the community is that they have the potential to provide access to resources, including transit, economic opportunity, groceries, social amenities, and, yes, public open space, to our community members who are most in need of connection and stability, including seniors and those living with disabilities. Affordable housing on this site can make this vision of an #EastLibertyforAll a reality, and the public park can provide the platform for all community members to come together, regardless of age, race, gender, or social status.

The redevelopment of East Liberty in the 1960s that created the Penn Plaza and Enright Park sites took many years of planning and study, and still it created more problems than it addressed. Together, we need to take the steps necessary to ensure that we are not faced with a similar set of missteps in this redevelopment process.

 

Next Steps

Help us get the message out! We are stronger together and we must stand together to fight for #AffordableHousing and #PublicParks. 

Submit your letters supporting #AffordableHousing and #PublicParks in an #EastLibertyforAll to your elected officials and Planning Commission. ED: Please send your letters and comments to: dolores.hanna@pittsburghpa.gov prior to 12 pm Tuesday, January 10, 2017 to get them in the record of the hearing!

Most importantly, plan to attend upcoming community meetings, to be announced shortly, and attend the City’s Planning Commission meeting on Tuesday, January 10, 2017 at 2 pm. 

Please share this post to your social network and follow us on Facebook and Twitter. 

*ED 1/8/2017: Some ask "why a developer should be required to have affordable housing on their property?" Outside of the obvious, the reality is that this developer is using public land (the park) to benefit their development. They should therefore be providing benefit to the community at large. The bigger question is, why should WE, the tax paying public, allow a private developer to take apart a public park, destroy its environmental assets, and reconfigure it to their purposes without receiving significant benefit to our community.  



Saturday, December 17, 2016

Short Updates, Brief Reflections.

(This will be a brief post because it's late and there are Christmas cookies to be made for small children to decorate tomorrow, and soup and bread to be prepped for a wintery dinner. I hope that you have the opportunity to be enjoying winter with family and friends, and that you enjoy the solstice as much as we do!)

There has been some amazing recent coverage about what is happening in East Liberty and the new plans for Penn Plaza and Enright Park.This piece in the Huffington Post (originally published via Medium - please remember that the Huff Po doesn't pay contributors, so, if you can, send a few dollars towards Caitlyn so that she can keep up the work!) There's a minute of video of the amazing and fearless Jacquea Mae of 1Hood in the post; more live video on Facebook if you care to search too.

To quote the article "It’s important to show up to meetings like this if you can, it’s important to be ugly and unapologetic, it’s important to speak and keep speaking, and be angry, because if we are not angry then, to paraphrase Zora Neale Hurston, people will take everything away and say that you agreed."

This has been our experience time and time again with this project. Meetings are held and there is no action taken on any of the dialogue, yet the developers claim credit for just having shown up to begin with. We are done with that. Stay tuned. As we have said before, the park is an issue because it keeps us in the game, but it is not the whole game by far. An equitable East Liberty is the end game.

But I want to bring people's attention mostly to here, a 2005 piece in the Post-Gazette, just after the towers started coming down on Penn Circle. It's striking as it seems clear that we are destined to relive our mistakes and our lessons unlearned from history.

Thursday, December 15, 2016

A Continuation.

Thank you to everyone who showed up at the community meeting Monday night at East Liberty Presbyterian Church and at the Planning Commission on Tuesday Downtown. Thank you also to all the people who submitted comment to the Planning Commission even if they could not attend the meeting.

There was nearly three hours of testimony on the project, both for and against. By the time the testimony wrapped up just after 6 pm, the Commission hadn't had a chance to consider any of the submitted comment, and took a 5 minute break. When they reconvened, they unanimously voted to continue the hearing to the New Year, which means that they will discuss and then take a vote at that time.

This hearing is likely to be the January 10th, 2017 hearing, but could possibly be later in the month. We will keep you posted. There will NOT be more public testimony at that time, but we do recommend that if you have not been able to yet submit comment, please send it to: dolores.hanna@pittsburghpa.gov.

There are several articles about the hearing and the issues at stake. These include:

Ryan Deto's coverage via the City Paper's Blogh.
Tim Schooley in the Pittsburgh Business Times.
Diana Nelson Jones in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Bob Bauder in the Tribune Review.

Here is also a link to the statement issued by the coalition of neighborhood groups that have been opposing this development. This coalition includes Enright Park Neighborhood Association, the Bloomfield-Garfield Corporation, and the Friendship Community Group.

If anything, the meetings this week displayed the need for more work to happen together between the different interests. We have been saying it since the start, but healthy communities are predicated on on opportunity for all. Opportunity for housing, opportunity for education, opportunity for jobs, opportunity for open space. It is critical that we keep in mind how all of these issues intersect and that we continue to work together.

Keeping the park in the conversation is a way of having influence over the overall development. If this project were only happening on private property, we would have little opportunity for influence. However, because the developer wants to use and reconfigure public park space to serve their needs, we, the public, have greater voice and greater opportunity to influence the outcome.

Saturday, December 10, 2016

Update from the Land of Updates

(I have no idea why the formatting of the text below is so crazy but I learned my lesson and will never try to write a post in Word first to cut and paste it into Blogger. Sorry...)
If you haven’t already seen it, a reminder that you can download a complete copy of the Preliminary Land Development Plan here.
Here are some diagrams (bigger versions if you click on them) that may be useful to you in understanding what the developer is proposing to do. They have already demolished one of the Penn Plaza buildings. You can see how huge the site is if you walk by. This is the “Phase One” site. 


diagram of the proposed site plan with annotations added by enrightpark.org for clarity


Key points about Phase One (the site where demolition of Penn Plaza has already occurred):

50,000 square feet for a new Whole Foods (roughly double the existing store).
  • About 12,000 square feet of office space above.
  • 582 parking spaces in a 3 story parking a garage, accessed from South Euclid (Penn Circle West) and a new street that cuts across the park from South Negley. This street is currently unnamed, but sometimes referred to as “Eva Street” in the developer’s documents, but it is NOT the existing Eva Street.
  • 200 units of “market-rate” apartments.
  • None of these units will be affordable housing.
  • The new building is essentially the ENTIRE site that you can see cleared right now. There are no setbacks planned, except for immediately adjacent to the townhouses on S. Euclid and Topaz Way.

Key points about Phase Two (the site where 5600 Penn Avenue is still standing):

  • This will also be a “mixed-use” building program, meaning some mix of commercial, retail, and residential uses.
  • There will be another significant parking garage attached to it. We have heard up to another 600 parking spaces.
  • There will not be any affordable housing in this phase either.
diagram showing park as it exists today: everything in red will be demolished for development.


Key points about the park:

  • They are reconfiguring the park in order to use the northern-most third of the park for their development, to provide car access to Whole Foods.
  • They are destroying 17 of the trees, including at least 14 that were planted in the 1964 park design, when the park was formed to address the “urban blight” of East Liberty. Most of these trees are very tall and healthy pin oaks, which contribute significant environmental benefit to a neighborhood that is sorely lacking in green space. You can read moreabout the benefit of these trees in the report that Tree Pittsburgh did a few years ago when they were helping the City of Pittsburgh identify the places and resources that needed investment in their park system.
  • The reconfigured park will be very different in shape – a long and skinny leg out to Negley Avenue will need to also address a hill.
  • There is not yet (as of this writing) a financial commitment from either the developer or the City to pay for a redesign and rebuilding of the park.  


diagram of what a "reconfigured" park could look like

Key points about the neighborhood:

  • We are still trying to find a way to get affordable housing back into this site. We, the neighbors, have proposed different approaches and we hope that our partners at the City and East Liberty Development, Inc., will find a way to make something work. It will never replace all of the units lost, but if we can find a way to make sure that there are safe, affordable, accessible, and convenient apartments for some of our neighbors who desperately need and want to be part of this community, we will do everything that it takes.
  • There has been a small working group of residents who have been meeting regularly with the developer since the end of August, trying to negotiate a solution. We have put several proposals before them and have been rejected. We are still waiting to hear on our most recent one.
  • There have NOT been any open public meetings on this project since the City Council hearing in April, and before that there were two meetings to discuss the park only. Monday, December 12 from 6-8 pm will be the first time that the developer or the City have come out to talk to a broad cross-section of the neighborhood about the concerns for the development overall.  This meeting will be held at East Liberty Presbyterian Church, 116 South Highland Avenue. 
  • It sounds like all we talk about is the park, but the reality is that the park is only our point of entry into the conversation. We, the near neighbors, have been shut out of the discussion of whether there can or should be affordable housing on this site, which we believe is critical to a healthy East Liberty for all. The developer has refused to discuss this with us. And we clearly have little leverage to make it happen. 
  • What we do have is a critical PUBLIC resource (the park), that the developer wants to use to enhance their development project, but on their own terms. We have been trying to leverage this resource to make some degree of change to the proposed development. 

 And, finally, a few words about Whole Foods. 

We've heard a lot of murmurings about whether Whole Foods has a responsibility to the community. And a lot of, frankly, glee from people who want a better parking scenario, and who like to say "well it's not like Whole Foods evicted everyone..." and "...well at least it's not Walmart, now THAT would be horrible..." So here are a few facts for you to consider.
  • The architects on this project, MV+A Architects out of Washington DC, have designed upwards of 100 Whole Foods across the country, including the recent Wexford and South Hills stores. 
  • MV+A Architects have been working on this project for over two years now (fall of 2014), according to the comments made at Planning Commission both last week and last October. 
  • The Penn Plaza tenants received their initial eviction notices in June 2015.  
  • Whole Foods announced that they would be the anchor tenant in August 2016 after a year of the developer dancing around the question.
  • Which means that MV+A Architects and Whole Foods started working on this project nearly 9 months before residents were evicted. Which means that they knew full well what they were signing on for.
  • Up until winter of 2015/2016, Whole Foods was an active and engaged partner on the Enright Park Community Garden, having founded it with our neighborhood group and the Kentucky Avenue School 8 or so years ago. They provided both financial and staff support for the garden, and were active in talking about how they wanted Whole Foods to be part of the community.  This past summer, we were notified that they would no longer be involved in the operation of the garden.
  • Many of the Penn Plaza residents and other East Liberty community members are, in fact, regular customers at Whole Foods. For all its reputation as "Whole Paycheck", it is, actually, possible to shop there (if you avoid the fancy cheese) and come out with a grocery bill that is the same or less than at Giant Eagle, and be buying organics or gluten-free options or other foods that are specific to dietary wants or needs. We are all entitled to make choices about the kinds of food that we eat.    
  • And, finally, up until a few years ago, Whole Foods used to like to tout the fact that the East Liberty store had one of the highest uses of food stamps/EBT cards in the entire chain, across the country. If I remember correctly, it was along the lines of 10% of their total sales that were paid in EBT benefits. They felt that this indicated that they were contributing to the community in a positive way, and that it showed that they were not purely a gentrifying force. 
So you be the judge of where you want your dollars to go. 

Submitting Comments to Planning Commission

If you are looking to submit comments to Planning Commission, you can attend the public hearing on Tuesday, December 13 beginning at 2 pm, located at 200 Ross Street (first floor), Pittsburgh, 15219. If you cannot attend the meeting, but still wish to send comments, you can send them via e-mail to:
Dolores.hanna@pittsburghpa.gov 
subject line: Planning Commission Pennley Place South hearing.
 Be sure to send them by 12 noon the day of the hearing, and earlier if possible.

Tips for submitting to or speaking at Planning Commission:

Open with a short statement of why you are writing. E.g. “I am writing in opposition to the Preliminary Land Development Plan” or “I am writing in support of the PLDP” or “I am writing to ask you to consider specific issues in your review of the PLDP”. 
 
If you are speaking, you will have three minutes. Try to make a clear argument, rooted in fact, about why you are making the case that you are making. Be honest, and don’t be accusatory if you disagree with someone. Be passionate.

 

The Planning Commission can take the following actions on Tuesday: 
  • They can vote to APPROVE the PLDP. 
  • They can vote to REJECT the PLDP. 
  • They can vote to APPROVE the PLDP WITH CONDITIONS (e.g. Approved, but with the condition that the developer make all the buildings blue. [that’s a joke. More realistically, they would approve with the condition that the developer provide an additional setback, or provide more information to City staff for review about the street circulation. But they COULD add a condition about the color of the buildings if they really wanted to…]) 
  • They can move to TABLE the decision, pending further information or additional community process.
Your statement or e-mail can provide support for any one of these actions.
Frankly, it is highly doubtful that they will reject it outright. If there is a lot of opposition to the plan, a more likely scenario would be to table the decision and direct the developer to work with the City and community to address the major concerns. Or to approve it with conditions if it seems that the concerns can be addressed in this manner.

Final Notes. 

We frankly don't yet know what the statement from Enright Park Neighborhood Association will be yet on Tuesday. While we certainly do not endorse the development as it stands, we don't necessarily believe that outright opposition, as tempting as it may be, is the most productive answer. Instead, we will continue to review with the same concerns that we stated at the onset of the project in mind:
  • The importance of advancing an inclusive community vision, and one which promotes a diversity of income, age, gender, and race as the heart of a healthy neighborhood
  • Ensuring that the highest quality public space, and particularly that of the park, is maintained and developed with the broader East Liberty community in mind
  • Ensuring that the development is compatible with the existing community, both in terms of the built environment of the neighborhood and the shared vision/values of the community
  • Ensuring that changes to vehicular traffic patterns, pedestrian and bicycle circulation, and transit systems associated with the development are made through innovative and thoughtful solutions that advance strategies to enhance community connectivity and mobility in all forms

Further, as a community, we remain deeply committed to a vision for this site that brings with it affordable housing, not simply in the form of funds to be distributed elsewhere, but a commitment to a vision for East Liberty that provides equitable access to housing that is located near resources and opportunity. Concentrations of wealth can be just as detrimental to the community fabric as concentrations of poverty. The value of the Penn Plaza site to the community is that it has the potential to provide access to resources, including transit, groceries, and social amenities, to our community members who are most in need of connection and stability. Affordable housing on this site would be a significant benefit to many of our community members, including seniors and those living with disabilities.

We continue to advocate for a portion of the new housing to be allocated for affordable units.  

Thank you for being part of this and being part of East Liberty's future.